Posted by: Old Major | July 2, 2008

[GUEST POST] United We Say No Deal — Wounds from RBC Meeting Still Sting a Month Later

~ by Amber Daugherty, Guest Contributor

***

Suddenly I see
This is what I wanna be
Suddenly I see
Why the hell it means so much to me

~ as performed by KT Tunstall

***

I couldn’t sleep at all last night, for in my mind ran that old familiar tune of defeat.

I went to the kitchen to have a slice of pizza — comfort food in an increasingly uncomfortable world. I sat there, in the dark, thinking about my future, wondering if I would be okay. These past sixteen months have been brutal. Now with every heartbeat I felt haggard and beaten down.

I use the term ‘beaten down’ in the figurative sense, but sometimes the pain is so difficult I check the mirror to make sure I’m not bruised or cut. Standing there, the emptiness is deafening, almost as thunderous as the cries of disenfranchised Florida and Michigan voters.

How could Democrats allow things to spiral this far out of control?

I think back to my studies: women’s rights, civil rights, freedom of speech. Had all that time spent memorizing every word of the constitution, of JFK’s stirring inauguration speech, of MLK’s defiant demand for equality, and of Mary Wollstonecraft’s “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” been in vain? Should I question my teachers for insisting I read and savor these writings? Why should words mean much to me now when I have seen the rights of voters overlooked, their voices are silenced?

I have heard Martin Luther King Jr. repeat his timeless words over and over again in my mind:

“Let us not wallow in the valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends. And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’”

While I know he was referring to African Americans and the hardships they face in their struggles, these words have new meaning today.

JFK, too, once empowered me to look beyond the injustice I am witnessing:

“We observe today not a victory of party but a celebration of freedom–-symbolizing an end as well as a beginning–-signifying renewal as well as change.”

Too bad I can’t completely agree anymore.

It’s been just over a month since thirty people decided to ignore the voters of Florida and Michigan, giving delegates to a candidate who didn’t earn them. Is it because he’s a man? Is it because he’s a black man?

I’ve given this countless hours of careful consideration. I’m well educated, I know my history and I’ve won my share of accolades in the field of human rights debates. I have no protest to the nomination of a well experienced, honest, steadfast African American candidate…there’s just one problem — that’s not what we’ve got.

According to my youth and education, I should be voting for this candidate…but I’m not. And there’s a reason I’m holding onto my precious vote — he didn’t earn it.

Throughout this historic process, we have seen many advances in America’s ability to be “color blind,” but we’ve also been dealt a heavy blow by the media’s reticent behavior when it comes to a female candidate. A highly qualified, intelligent, compassionate, brave, ready to step up and be counted WOMAN. A woman who has more than thirty years of experience working to better the lives of other women, children, the working class, Hispanics, African-Americans, the elderly — everyday people.

A woman who has dedicated her life to helping and speaking up for those who cannot help or speak for themselves, who find it too difficult to get anyone to hear them…but she listens. For her many years spent on such a noble crusade, what does she get in return?

She’s called vile names, her very life is threatened, she is the victim of personal attacks, she is nothing short of abused. Abuse doesn’t have to be a slap or a kick in order to hurt. Having your life’s work, your legacy thrown back in your face hurts.

Every insult hurled her way hit me too; every cheap shot affected me just as much as her…if not more. I’ve become accustomed to the fact that powerful woman are often treated as less than powerful men. It constantly pushes into my subconscious, pulling at my already fragile faith in the advances we have made as women — marching in protest, demanding the right to vote. Mothers, daughters, sisters and wives insisting men and other women treat them as equals.

These women are my heroes; they stood up and took action against the sometimes disheartening male dominated world they lived in. They expected to be treated with dignity and the respect they rightfully deserved. All the rights denied to them — the right to vote, the right to equality, the right to have the opportunity for advanced education — are freedoms we take for granted today.

In her book, Wollstonecraft contended that society will degenerate without educated women, particularly because mothers are the primary educators of young children. Every time the media shoots down a woman for being independent — for not leaning on a man for support when things get heated — one can’t help but wonder if they’d ever think these things about their own mothers. If you’re willing to say such malicious remarks about a woman who is merely running for a highly coveted office, and who has the experience and knowledge to execute the office correctly, you should also be willing to admit that you don’t take the women’s rights movement seriously. That your mothers, daughters, wives, sisters, and all the women in your life who are of any value shouldn’t be taken seriously.

I shall not give my vote to a party that has thrown Democracy to the wind. I will stand instead beside my fellow Americans, for we are all the victims of prejudice at times. We are women, men, children. We are white, black, rich, poor, young, old, well educated, smart enough to know the difference between right and wrong, between just and unjust. I stand because I refuse to allow a lesser candidate to take a nomination he didn’t deserve. I refuse to step down and accept that I am defeated In standing up for myself and my rights I am taking a stand against a media dripping wet with misogyny and sexism.

I stand for my country, my future, myself, and my President, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

A change in the wind is upon us, I intend to fill my sails and coast through the stormy seas of a mismanaged nomination process. I shall dock on the port of life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and equality for all.

United beside Hillary we shall all stand.

***

Responses

I, too, fully support HRC still.
She continues to stand head and shoulders above the rest of the field and if her party won’t support her, I can no longer support her party.
On May 31, I requested paperwork to change party affiliations and am now officially an NP, but in my heart, a Hillocrat.
PUMA is nice, but Hillocrat more accurately describes who I am.
That the Dems would sacrifice the presidency for hoped-for down-ticket growth is the silliest proposition of this election cycle.
Howard Dean’s Revenge (BHO) is so woefully incompetent that nothing good will come from his nomination.
A pox be on all their houses.
Fools.

From working with Republicans, I know that they were not going to let Hillary Clinton win. In a coordinated effort, they allowed Obama to be the candidate due to aggressive African-Americans “within” the party that would allow the covering-ups for certain persons and situations regarding our country.

A terific column here! The Dumbocrats had a perfect opportunity for real Change: Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton. They blew it.

I will never forgive Barack’s sexism and insulting comments (periodically, she feels moody…her claws are coming out) and how the misogynist media frat-boys pushed him to a fraudulent finish-line of superdels! I will not forgie his demeaning, degrading sexism in the yutube mega-hit:
“Obama Gives Hillary the Finger” where he has a well-orchestrated jayZ rapper act in which he uses hid mifinger and brushes off his shoes (like excrement!) of Hillary! Is this the respect this Chicago thugster shows to his fellow female Senator? This smirking, smug highschooler wants to be President? Gime a break!
And to have allowed his 2 young impressionable little girls to sit on Sundays in that toxic poison of a ‘church’ and witness the pastor’s wild lewd gyrations….And to have voted in favor of sex shops near schools and early parole for sex offenders - ‘present’ vote is to not take a stand! What a coward and impostor!

Come November, the 18 million craacks will shatter the DNC’s ceiling and maybe then they’ll see the Light and be cured of their ObaMyopia for good!

We’re Pumas, hear us Roar!

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

NoBama ‘08
Hillary Forever!

NoBAMA’08, McCAIN’08

Hillary Clinton’12

Please read my post on pumaparty.com. It is called “The Audacity of the Political Lynching by the DNC”. I go to various sites and at all of them I am trying to encourage everyone to organize. Many sites are not taking member’s info and data and breaking it down state by state so we can get the numbers we need to be really effective.
Marg Mackall, central ky,

Hillary won my respect from the day Bill took office, took ‘public’ beating time and again and survived what few could with dignity and courage and never gave up the fight. My awe of her grows with every adverse event that she rises to, fights back, and never giving up. Women truly are the ‘real’ minority- about time we stood up for one who has stood up for us with a lifetime of service and treated with such malignant disrespect. I believe the Republican party would rather have NOT had her as a contender, better to choose an inexperienced ‘waffler’ just as long as he was one of the ‘good ole boy’s club’ and more easily discredited than they could Hillary. Not much left that they can throw at her, don’t think Obama has a clue what will hit him when the ‘machine’ kicks in. Heaven help this country, when it’s citizens are too bovine to know the difference between empty charisma and the real thing. Totally disenchanted with the cretins who put the GWB in office twice and are now flocking like sheep to another ’smoke screen’.

The humiliation at the hands of the DNC for selecting Obama against the will of the people only makes my resolve stronger. These unjust actions of a select powerful few are what propel gargantuan social and political movements. I’m proud to be a member of PUMA and stand defiant against the Democratic party. I’m proud to be an American.

Well said, Amber. Well said indeed.

One minor correction, though — eight brave individuals, led by Howard Ickes, voted against the MI so-called “Compromise” (taking four of Mrs. Clinton’s earned delegates plus all 55 Uncommitted delegates and giving ‘em directly to Obama). Twelve voted for full reinstatement of the FL delegation. Please don’t blame them.

Now, as for the twenty who voted for the so-called “MI Compromise,” blame them all you want, as well as the two “leaders” James Roosevelt, Jr., and Alex what’s-her-name. Most if not all of them were the ones who voted against FL being fully reinstated, if you’re counting at home.

The RBC meeting was a travesty, and reprehensible in its concept and scope, but not everyone who attended that meeting was a bad actor, as I just pointed out.

Now, as for the so-called Democratic “leadership” that’s led us to this pass — the less said, the better! Let’s just get ‘em on out of there, starting with Nancy Pelosi. Cindy Sheehan has a shot in SF — she can beat Pelosi, if she gets enough money to do so.

My thought is that in order to send a real message, we should help Mrs. Sheehan once we’ve managed to pay down Mrs. Clinton’s debt. Those two things, along with denying Obama a win in ‘08, will change the party — or it will be wholly destroyed, and go the way of the Whigs.

Either way works for me.

LSekhmet
Democrat-Against-Obama

Fellow Democrats,

You need only consider the Supreme Court to realize that a McCain presidency would be disastrous—and I use that term advisedly. The justices most likely to be replaced in the next President’s term are two of the remaining four so-called liberals on the court. By replacing them with two Scalia-Roberts types (as he has proclaimed he would do), McCain could solidify conservative domination of the court and lock it in for decades. Seriously, think about it.

As just one example, among the critical issues hanging in the balance is separation of church and state. Some of the most critical decisions in recent years maintaining that separation have been 5-4. Put differently, with the Court’s current composition, we’re only one vote away from kissing separation of church and state, at least as we’ve known it, goodbye. I, for one, say that alone is far too great a risk to warrant throwing the election to the Republicans in order to reprimand the DNC for perceived wrongs.

When one considers too that the policy views of Obama and Clinton are largely congruent and quite different from those of McCain, the reasons for Clinton supporters to vote for Obama are obvious and overwhelming. Sure, I don’t agree with every position he takes. Indeed, we’re currently seeing both candidates move toward the center as typically happens at this stage of the race, each with the aim of holding on to those in the “base” (even though risking irritating and disappointing them somewhat) while appealing to those in the middle. All in all, though after I consider their respective stands on the main issues (the wars, the economy, environment, health care, etc.), I (and Hillary BTW) largely agree with Obama and seriously disagree with McCain on every one. On the issues, for this Democrat, it’s a no brainer.

As for Obama’s character, when I take his measure, I see someone who generally shares my values and views, genuinely cares about our people and country, recognizes the real problems, and approaches the solutions much as I do. He’s hardly perfect, but he’s pretty damn good and vastly superior to the scary alternative.

I urge you to step back, consider more than just perceived wrongs in the nomination process, and weigh all—all—the consequences when choosing what to do with your vote in the general election.

PS This Obama supporter donated $500 to Clinton.

A word to Dougindeep. This blog is for people who do not support the presumptive nominee of the Democratic party. There are a number of reasons that we do not support Obama, and in many cases no longer support the party itself. Both my husband and I changed our voter registration to unaffiliated the first day we could after the rules committee fiasco. We had not been happy when in a fit of temper the rules committee took away all of the delagates of two states when the party rules clearly stated that they could take away half. It had become quite clear before that that the party was not going to allow Senator Clinton to be the nominee, despite whatever outcome of the voting. The final straw for us was the decision over Michigan’s delagates.
From the beginning of this primary season I found nothing to support in mr. Obama. To be fair though, I went to his U.S. Senate web site and studied his record. I was less than impressed. Still, I listened to the man in the debates and some of his speeches, I never found a new concrete idea coming from him. I wanted to know exactly what he meant by hope and change. Toward the end of the primaries the decision came down to three. Clearly as a democrat I supported Clinton, but if she was not a choice, McCain has been around long enough that I feel like I know I can trust him with the country and with the future of my children’s choices. Now I have grave concerns about Obama. Like many other established families we have stock investments, we do not like the proposals to raise taxes on those. We have real dislike for his proposal to raise the inheritance taxes to 45 percent. What incentive does that give for saving or even investing in the country? I can answer that, absolutely none! Many of the people that the Obama campaign needs to reach are in the same group we are in. Our parents have saved for years and have planned to leave something to the kids, we do not want them to have scrimped for the government to grab the hard earned and saved money. Today much of that money helps students attend college and start of in their own homes and careers. Be serious, college loans are harder to obtain and more expensive, and home ownership is becoming a distant dream.
Now about your claims of choices for the supreme court. That brings out some real differences with Obama and what I believe in. I did graduate from college, and a requirement was taking a course about American government. In that course I learned that, as I had seen in real life, while the president can put forth a choice-the Senate must approve of that choice. At this time the senate is leaning Democratic. There is no reason for the supreme court to take up issues like Roe-Wade unless a case is brought before it that relates to that issue. Also, I personally hate guns and have simply walked out when they are brought out in family gatherings or in public. The thing is, I do not feel that I have the right to deny someone the ability to defend home and family with one if they are comfortable using a gun. Mr. Obama has a long record of not supporting that concept.
I would respectfully ask that those who are supporting Obama stop harrassing those who do not. This is a democracy. We are guaranteed certain rights by the Constitution and freedom of speech is the first of the ammendments granting those rights. I am never going to enter one of Mr. Obama’s supporters sites and try to change what they believe, foolish as I might believe them to be. I have been following the childish and rude behavior exhibited by many of those supporters and have concerns about the ability to show respect or even understand that the very fundamental beliefs this country was founded around is freedom of speech, religion and choice itself. You will not change what we believe and anger many of us even more when you behave in this manner.

BTW Doug,

You might want to look into Obama’s new stances concerning faith-based initiatives and the separation of church and state before you start claiming it as a reason we should support Obama.

Obama is not a progressive. Period. Plus, we prefer to devil we know, rather than the devil we don’t.

As for the issues, Obama’s stance on the war changes with the wind. I have no faith that he plans to withdraw troops, and even if he does, I have no faith that with his severe lack of experience that he is capable of withdrawing safely if at all.

On the environment, McCain was the first to break with his party and acknowledge Global Warming. He disagrees with drilling in ANWR and agrees we need to become less dependent on foreign oil.

As for healthcare, I view Obama’s non-mandate plan as a hinderance to actually ever achieving universal care. I prefer to have McCain’s market approach than to have Obama create more barackracy and turn the country off to further measures to bring us to a universal system.

On the SCOTUS, I’m really tired of this being drug out and used to coax us into submission. The Court already has a conservative majority and Obama was in support of Roberts and was going to vote for him until one of his aids told him it would be bad for him when he ran for office. I already addressed his stance concerning church and state, and moreover, Obama has been pandering to the anti-choice movement and is wishy washy when it comes to choice. Again, he’s not a progressive.

Thank you for your comment and donation to Hillary.

ubnmr iecoq nemiufs hloi

lxtec itdmygs mljrask

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories